TM4J vs. qTest

If you are faced with the challenge of having to choose a test management tool, then you now realize that the amount of comparatives can be mind boggling. The important guideline to remember is that the testing tool you eventually select needs to fit your individual QA process’s needs: Team size, testing methodology, budget and functionalities. You can use this comparison checklist here to help you narrow down your search.

To understand the full price of Jira add-ons, click here.

TM4J screenshot

qTest screenshot

If you have narrowed if down between Test Management for Jira Vs. qTest, we have created this comparison table specifying the main features that you should regard.

TM4J screenshot

qTest screenshot

If you want better comparison between the tools you are checking, and the features available in other tools, please click below

TM4J

qTest

See who is scored higher than TM4J

See who is scored higher than qTest

Requirement and User Stories Management

	Support for hierarchical requirements

Test case management

	Add attachments to each test step
	Clone Tests between projects
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reusable test repositories
	Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)

Test Sets and Execution Management

Audit history of runs and results
Edit tests during runs
Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce
Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers
Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
Reuse tests from repository for any test set run
Test Set Permutations	N/A	N/A

Issue management

	Independent issue management module
	Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
	Ability to report issues directly from emails
	Batch editing

Integrations

	Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems
	Integration with Test Automation Tools
	Integration with Source Control systems
	Zapier
	API
	Slack integration
	Webhooks

Customization

	Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)
	Custom Workflow
	Custom fields and filters
	Permissions & personalized mail notifications

Reporting

	Customizable Dashboards graphs, reports and metrics
	Scheduled reports

Additional Features

Import & Export all data
Search (ability to add criteria)
External dashboard and embedding graphs
Cloud or Installed	Both	Both
Task Board

Security and Certifications

	Soc 2
	ISO 27001

Service and Support

	Service and Support

Compare TM4J to PractiTest

Compare qTest to PractiTest

“When I compare it to other solutions I’ve worked with before, I can say that PractiTest is much faster and is of better value.”

– Udi Vered, Zerto’s Director of QA

Didn’t find what you are looking for?

Try this dynamic comparison tool