2019 Test Management Tool Comparison: PractiTest Vs. qTest
Choosing a Test Management tool can be a challenge, especially with the variety of options available. The increasing demand for speedy delivery with Agile oriented practices means continuously testing while keeping track of everything.
The following is comparison of two popular Test Management tools and the key
features to look for when choosing the right QA solution for your work
process.
| PractiTest | qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| End-to-End Coverage & Methodology: |
|
|
| Customization |
Unique Hierarchical filters to organize information |
|
| Issue Workflow |
|
|
| Reporting |
|
|
| Requirement Management |
|
|
| Test case management |
|
|
| Test Set and Execution Management |
|
|
| Issue management |
|
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
|
| Service and Support |
|
|
|
Integrations: [i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API] |
|
|
| Zapier integration |
|
|
| Slack integration |
|
|
Additional features: |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cloud only |
Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing |
35$/45$ per tester, 15$ per developer |
By request |
Training and methodology |
||
| PractiTest | qTest | |
| End-to-End Coverage & Methodology: | ||
|---|---|---|
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| Customization | ||
| qTest |
Unique Hierarchical filters to organize information |
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| Issue Workflow | ||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| Reporting | ||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| Requirement Management | ||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| Test case management | ||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| Test Set and Execution Management | ||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| Issue management | ||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
|
|
| Service and Support | ||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
|
Integrations: [i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API] |
||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| Zapier integration | ||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| Slack integration | ||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
Additional features: |
||
|
||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
|
||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
|
||
| qTest |
Cloud only |
|
| TestLodge |
Both |
|
|
||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
|
||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
|
||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
|
||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
|
||
| qTest |
|
|
| TestLodge |
|
|
Pricing |
||
| qTest |
35$/45$ per tester, 15$ per developer |
|
| TestLodge |
By request |
|
Training and methodology |
||
Summary
Both PractiTest and qTest are Agile
compatible Test Management tools that offer end-to-end
coverage of the entire QA process: Requirements, Tests and Test Case
management, Issue Management and Reporting.
While qTest offers both cloud and server (in-house) hosting for its software, PractiTest is a SaaS only solution.
However, PractiTest became the most secure Saas test management tool after obtaining both SOC type II certificate and the ISO 27001 certificate and is now in compliance with the strictest security standards in the industry.
In addition, PractiTest offers an internal kanban task board that helps managing your projects in a more efficient manner.
PractiTest’s unique Hierarchical filters, make it possible to define parameters for test cases and test sets, avoid duplicate bugs, and in general offer a smarter way to easily manage all project information.
Match that with a designated user experienced discussion forum (on top of it’s in-app support) and PractiTest takes the lead.