PractiTest Vs. qTest

Choosing a Test Management tool can be a challenge, especially with the variety of options available. The increasing demand for speedy delivery with Agile oriented practices means continuously testing while keeping track of everything.

PractiTest

qTest

The following is comparison of two popular Test Management tools, PractiTest Vs. qTest, and the key features to look for when choosing the right QA solution for your work process.

PractiTest

qTest

If you want better comparison between the tools you are checking, and the features available in other tools, please click below

	PractiTest	qTest
Requirement and User Stories Management
Support for hierarchical requirements	v	v
Test case management
Add attachments to each test step	v	v
Clone Tests between projects	v	v
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)	v	v
Reusable test repositorys	v	v
Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)	v	v
Test Sets and Execution Management
Audit history of runs and results	v	v
Edit tests during runs	v	v
Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce	v	v
Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers	v	v
Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets	v	v
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)	v	v
Reuse tests from repository for any test set run	v	v
Test Set Permutations
Issue management
Independent issue management module	v	v
Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues	v	x
Ability to report issues directly from emails	v	x
Batch editing	v	v
Integrations
Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems	v	v
Integration with Test Automation Tools	v	v
Integration with Source Control systems	v	v
Zapier	v	x
API	v	v
Slack integration	v	v
Webhooks	v	v
Customization
Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)	v	x
Custom Workflow	v	v
Custom fields and filters	v	v
Permissions & personalized mail notifications	v	v
Reporting
Customizable Graphs/Dashboards and reports	v	v
Scheduled reports	v	v
Additional features
Import & Export all data	v	v
Search (ability to add criteria)	v	x
External dashboard and embedding graphs	v	x
Cloud or Installed	Cloud	Both
Task Board	v	v
Security and certifications
Soc 2	v	x
ISO 27001	v	x
Service and Support
Service and Support	v	v

So, what is the verdict?

Both PractiTest and qTest are Agile compatible Test Management tools that offer end-to-end coverage of the entire QA process: Requirements, Tests and Test Case management, Issue Management and Reporting.

While qTest offers both cloud and server (in-house) hosting for its software, PractiTest is a SaaS only solution.

However, PractiTest became the most secure Saas test management tool after obtaining both SOC type II certificate and the ISO 27001 certificate and is now in compliance with the strictest security standards in the industry.

In addition, PractiTest offers an internal kanban task board that helps managing your projects in a more efficient manner.

PractiTest’s unique Hierarchical filters, make it possible to define parameters for test cases and test sets, avoid duplicate bugs, and in general offer a smarter way to easily manage all project information.

Match that with a designated user experienced discussion forum (on top of it’s in-app support) and PractiTest takes the lead.

Didn’t find what you are looking for? Try this dynamic comparison tool