TM4J vs. QA QAComplete

If you have decided to upgrade or switch your test management solution, then you are aware of the large variety of tools available. The key is choosing the most fitting tool that will meet your QA process and expectations.

To understand the full price of Jira add-ons, click here.

TM4J screenshot

QA QAComplete screenshot

When comparing testing solutions we recommend using helpful checklist to guide your search. If you are debating between Test Management for Jira Vs. QAComplete, you will find the following comparison helpful as well.

TM4J screenshot

QA QAComplete screenshot

If you want better comparison between the tools you are checking, and the features available in other tools, please click below

TM4J

QA QAComplete

See who is scored higher than TM4J

See who is scored higher than QA QAComplete

Requirement and User Stories Management

	Support for hierarchical requirements

Test case management

	Add attachments to each test step
	Clone Tests between projects
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reusable test repositories
	Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)

Test Sets and Execution Management

Audit history of runs and results
Edit tests during runs
Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce
Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers
Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
Reuse tests from repository for any test set run
Test Set Permutations	N/A	N/A

Issue management

	Independent issue management module
	Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
	Ability to report issues directly from emails
	Batch editing

Integrations

	Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems
	Integration with Test Automation Tools
	Integration with Source Control systems
	Zapier
	API
	Slack integration
	Webhooks

Customization

	Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)
	Custom Workflow
	Custom fields and filters
	Permissions & personalized mail notifications

Reporting

	Customizable Dashboards graphs, reports and metrics
	Scheduled reports

Additional Features

Import & Export all data
Search (ability to add criteria)
External dashboard and embedding graphs
Cloud or Installed	Both	Both
Task Board

Security and Certifications

	Soc 2
	ISO 27001

Service and Support

	Service and Support

Compare TM4J to PractiTest

Compare QA QAComplete to PractiTest

“We evaluated several different test management platforms and chose PractiTest as our company standard. We are now consolidating our various test management systems into PractiTest.”

– Arthur Meloy, VP Site Reliability Engineering at NCR

Didn’t find what you are looking for?

Try this dynamic comparison tool