PractiTest vs. QAComplete

If you have decided to upgrade or switch your test management solution, then you are aware of the large variety of tools available. The key is choosing the most fitting tool that will meet your QA process and expectations.

PractiTest screenshot

QAComplete screenshot

To bring you one step closer we have compared PractiTest and QAComplete. Both test management tools offer full QA coverage for user stories, test management, test sets and runs, issue management and reports.

PractiTest screenshot

QAComplete screenshot

If you would like one of our specialists to walk you through this table and explain the various features and their importance, simply click the button to set a meeting.

PractiTest

QAComplete

Requirement and User Stories Management

	Support for hierarchical requirements

Test case management

	Add attachments to each test step
	Clone Tests between projects
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reusable test repositories
	Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)

Test Sets and Execution Management

	Audit history of runs and results
	Edit tests during runs
	Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce
	Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers
	Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reuse tests from repository for any test set run
	Test Set Permutations		N/A

Issue management

	Independent issue management module
	Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
	Ability to report issues directly from emails
	Batch editing

Integrations

	Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems
	Integration with Test Automation Tools
	Integration with Source Control systems
	Zapier
	API
	Slack integration
	Webhooks

Customization

	Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)
	Custom Workflow
	Custom fields and filters
	Permissions & personalized mail notifications

Reporting

	Customizable Dashboards graphs, reports and metrics
	Scheduled reports

Additional Features

Import & Export all data
Search (ability to add criteria)
External dashboard and embedding graphs
Cloud or Installed	Cloud	Both
Task Board

Security and Certifications

	Soc 2
	ISO 27001

Service and Support

	Service and Support

“When I compare it to other solutions I’ve worked with before, I can say that PractiTest is much faster and is of better value.”

– Udi Vered, Zerto’s Director of QA

So, what is the verdict?

While both tools have their Pros and Cons these are the main things you should consider

PractiTest is a SaaS based tool, which is a better fit for Agile and DevOps envrionemnts. The system has an end-to-end capability it also integrates with leading tools such as Slack and Zapier and allow you to report issues directly from your email client. reports can be embeded in external dashboards, which all sum to a more open environemnt. Important to note throught that open doesn't mean insecure. it is Soc 2 ISO27001 and GDPR complaint.

QAComplete is a part of SmartBear corporation, which has it's advantages and shortcomings. You have the peace of mind that this is a stable organization, that is now going to disappear anytime soon. On the other hand, your tools is yet another one of their list, and no one guarantee that R&D efforts will continue, making it a good fit for both current and fututre requirements.

PractiTest vs. QAComplete

So, what is the verdict?

Want to learn more?