PractiTest Vs. QAComplete

If you have decided to upgrade or switch your test management solution, then you are aware of the large variety of tools available. The key is choosing the most fitting tool that will meet your QA process and expectations.

 

practitest

PractiTest screenshot

qacomplete

QAComplete screenshot

To bring you one step closer we have compared PractiTest and QAComplete. Both test management tools offer full QA coverage for user stories, test management, test sets and runs, issue management and reports.

 

practitest

PractiTest screenshot

qacomplete

QAComplete screenshot

If you want one of our team members to walk you through this table and better explain different features and their importance, just click the button and set a meeting

PractiTest QAComplete
Requirement and User Stories Management
Support for hierarchical requirements
Test case management
Add attachments to each test step
Clone Tests between projects
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
Reusable test repositories
Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)
Test Sets and Execution Management
Audit history of runs and results
Edit tests during runs
Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce
Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers
Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
Reuse tests from repository for any test set run
Test Set Permutations N/A
Issue management
Independent issue management module
Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
Ability to report issues directly from emails
Batch editing
Integrations
Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems
Integration with Test Automation Tools
Integration with Source Control systems
Zapier
API
Slack integration
Webhooks
Customization
Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)
Custom Workflow
Custom fields and filters
Permissions & personalized mail notifications
Reporting
Customizable Graphs/Dashboards and reports
Scheduled reports
Additional features
Import & Export all data
Search (ability to add criteria)
External dashboard and embedding graphs
Cloud or Installed Cloud Both
Task Board
Security and certifications
Soc 2
ISO 27001
Service and Support
Service and Support

So, what is the verdict?

 

While both tools have their Pros and Cons these are the main things you should consider

 

PractiTest is a SaaS based tool, which is a better fit for Agile and DevOps envrionemnts. The system has an end-to-end capability it also integrates with leading tools such as Slack and Zapier and allow you to report issues directly from your email client. reports can be embeded in external dashboards, which all sum to a more open environemnt. Important to note throught that open doesn't mean insecure. it is Soc 2 ISO27001 and GDPR complaint.

 

QAComplete is a part of SmartBear corporation, which has it's advantages and shortcomings. You have the peace of mind that this is a stable organization, that is now going to disappear anytime soon. On the other hand, your tools is yet another one of their list, and no one guarantee that R&D efforts will continue, making it a good fit for both current and fututre requirements.

Want to learn more?

Sign up now to a free web session to choose the right test management tool