PractiTest Vs. QAComplete

If you have decided to upgrade or switch your test management solution, then you are aware of the large variety of tools available. The key is choosing the most fitting tool that will meet your QA process and expectations.

 

PractiTest

practitest

QAComplete

qacomplete

 

To bring you one step closer we have compared PractiTest and QAComplete. Both test management tools offer full QA coverage for user stories, test management, test sets and runs, issue management and reports.

 

PractiTest

practitest

QAComplete

qacomplete

If you want better comparison between the tools you are checking, and the features available in other tools, please click below


PractiTest
QAComplete
Requirement and User Stories Management
Support for hierarchical requirements v v
Test case management
Add attachments to each test step v v
Clone Tests between projects v v
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion) v v
Reusable test repositorys v v
Exploratory Testing module (session based testing) v x
Test Sets and Execution Management
Audit history of runs and results v v
Edit tests during runs v v
Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce v v
Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers v v
Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets v v
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion) v v
Reuse tests from repository for any test set run v v
Test Set Permutations
Issue management
Independent issue management module v v
Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues v x
Ability to report issues directly from emails v x
Batch editing v v
Integrations
Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems v v
Integration with Test Automation Tools v v
Integration with Source Control systems v v
Zapier v x
API v v
Slack integration v x
Webhooks v v
Customization
Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types) v x
Custom Workflow v v
Custom fields and filters v v
Permissions & personalized mail notifications v v
Reporting
Customizable Graphs/Dashboards and reports v v
Scheduled reports v v
Additional features
Import & Export all data v v
Search (ability to add criteria) v v
External dashboard and embedding graphs v x
Cloud or Installed Cloud Both
Task Board v v
Security and certifications
Soc 2 v x
ISO 27001 v x
Service and Support
Service and Support v v

So, what is the verdict?

 

While both tools have their Pros and Cons these are the main things you should consider

 

PractiTest is a SaaS based tool, which is a better fit for Agile and DevOps envrionemnts. The system has an end-to-end capability it also integrates with leading tools such as Slack and Zapier and allow you to report issues directly from your email client. reports can be embeded in external dashboards, which all sum to a more open environemnt. Important to note throught that open doesn't mean insecure. it is Soc 2 ISO27001 and GDPR complaint.

 

QAComplete is a part of SmartBear corporation, which has it's advantages and shortcomings. You have the peace of mind that this is a stable organization, that is now going to disappear anytime soon. On the other hand, your tools is yet another one of their list, and no one guarantee that R&D efforts will continue, making it a good fit for both current and fututre requirements.

Didn’t find what you are looking for? Try this dynamic comparison tool