QMetry Vs. Aqua

Choosing a Test Management tool isn’t simple. Not only are there so many tools to choose from, but they all go on to specify a long complicated list of features you simply “must have”. The truth is that there is not one tool that is objectively better than another. As the best tool is the one that fits your own QA process and it’s demands. So the key is knowing what features you need, and then finding out which of the test management tool available matches your requirements.

QMetry screenshot

Aqua screenshot

You can download the more advanced checklist we compiled, to use when starting your evaluation process. If you have narrowed it down already between Aqua and QMetry, the following comparison reviews the main strengths and weaknesses of both.

QMetry screenshot

Aqua screenshot

If you want better comparison between the tools you are checking, and the features available in other tools, please click below

QMetry

Aqua

See who is scored higher than QMetry

See who is scored higher than Aqua

Requirement and User Stories Management

	Support for hierarchical requirements

Test case management

	Add attachments to each test step
	Clone Tests between projects
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reusable test repositories
	Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)

Test Sets and Execution Management

	Audit history of runs and results
	Edit tests during runs
	Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce
	Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers
	Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reuse tests from repository for any test set run
	Test Set Permutations		N/A

Issue management

	Independent issue management module
	Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
	Ability to report issues directly from emails
	Batch editing

Integrations

	Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems
	Integration with Test Automation Tools
	Integration with Source Control systems
	Zapier
	API
	Slack integration
	Webhooks

Customization

	Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)
	Custom Workflow
	Custom fields and filters
	Permissions & personalized mail notifications

Reporting

	Customizable Dashboards graphs, reports and metrics
	Scheduled reports

Additional features

Import & Export all data
Search (ability to add criteria)
External dashboard and embedding graphs
Cloud or Installed	Both	Both
Task Board

Security and certifications

	Soc 2
	ISO 27001

Service and Support

	Service and Support

Compare QMetry to PractiTest

Compare Aqua to PractiTest

Avijit Amitabh, Alstorm Test Delivery Manager

“We evaluated 9 tools, but PractiTest stood apart from others based on ease of use and their advanced integration features. The advanced easy-to-implement reporting features provide live transparency for management to get a clear picture of test status. The pricing is also quite competitive when compared with other major players in this domain.”

– Avijit Amitabh, Test Delivery Manager, Alstom

Didn’t find what you are looking for?

Try this dynamic comparison tool