PractiTest Vs. QMetry
Searching for a test management solution is not an easy task. There are many possible tools to choose from, each promising to to be the best tool for your QA management needs. Even though the amount of options is vast ,it is best to focus on a small amount of test management tools (3-4) and compare their main features, before you proceed and do a free trial with real testing data.
PractiTest
QMetry
We have saved you some of the trouble, this time comparing PractiTest and QMetry. Both are End-to-end test management solutions, that cover the entire QA process from Requirement, Test Sets & Runs, Issues and reporting.
PractiTest
QMetry
If you want better comparison between the tools you are checking, and the features available in other tools, please click below
| Requirement and User Stories Management | ||
|---|---|---|
| Support for hierarchical requirements | v | v |
| Test case management | ||
| Add attachments to each test step | v | v |
| Clone Tests between projects | v | v |
| Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion) | v | v |
| Reusable test repositorys | v | v |
| Exploratory Testing module (session based testing) | v | x |
| Test Sets and Execution Management | ||
| Audit history of runs and results | v | v |
| Edit tests during runs | v | v |
| Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce | v | v |
| Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers | v | v |
| Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets | v | v |
| Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion) | v | v |
| Reuse tests from repository for any test set run | v | v |
| Test Set Permutations | ||
| Issue management | ||
| Independent issue management module | v | v |
| Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues | v | v |
| Ability to report issues directly from emails | v | x |
| Batch editing | v | v |
| Integrations | ||
| Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems | v | v |
| Integration with Test Automation Tools | v | v |
| Integration with Source Control systems | v | v |
| Zapier | v | x |
| API | v | v |
| Slack integration | v | x |
| Webhooks | v | x |
| Customization | ||
| Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types) | v | x |
| Custom Workflow | v | x |
| Custom fields and filters | v | v |
| Permissions & personalized mail notifications | v | v |
| Reporting | ||
| Customizable Graphs/Dashboards and reports | v | v |
| Scheduled reports | v | x |
| Additional features | ||
| Import & Export all data | v | v |
| Search (ability to add criteria) | v | v |
| External dashboard and embedding graphs | v | x |
| Cloud or Installed | Cloud | Both |
| Task Board | v | x |
| Security and certifications | ||
| Soc 2 | v | x |
| ISO 27001 | v | v |
| Service and Support | ||
| Service and Support | v | v |
So, what is the verdict?
Both PractiTest and QMetry are powerful test management tools that offer great coverage for your QA process.
PractiTest Hierarchical filter tree is a major advantage as it makes the basic data organization and navigation more intuitive. This classification methodology exists for all testing modules: Requirements, Tests, Test Sets & Runs and Issues, and with traceability links in between. This will provide you with a better workflow with PractiTest, than QMetry.
QMetry is a part infoStretch Corporation, which its advantages and shortcomings. You know that the company is not going to disappear anytime soon, and you can choose a complete suite of solutions, have AD/LDAP support etc., but on the other hand, your tool is not their main focus.
While both solutions offer methodological support, we found PractiTest had a faster response time in general for all support matters. One nice feature that QMetry doesn’t offer is External dashboards. This useful for sharing customized project progress with management, as well as with clients via a direct external link to relevant graphs and reports or by embedding them anywhere.
Didn’t find what you are looking for? Try this dynamic comparison tool