PractiTest Vs. TestRail

Searching for a QA management solution can be daunting and very time consuming. There are many testing tools to choose from with various features all promising to fulfill your testing demands.

 

practitest

PractiTest screenshot

testrail

TestRail screenshot

PractiTest and TestRail are both leading Test Management Solutions often considered by test teams looking to organize, upgrade and take charge of their testing process. The comparison below reviews the main features to take into account when considering which one of the two will best fit your QA needs.

 

practitest

PractiTest screenshot

testrail

TestRail screenshot

If you want one of our team members to walk you through this table and better explain different features and their importance, just click the button and set a meeting

Button description
PractiTest TestRail
Requirement and User Stories Management
Support for hierarchical requirements
Test case management
Add attachments to each test step
Clone Tests between projects
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
Reusable test repositories
Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)
Test Sets and Execution Management
Audit history of runs and results
Edit tests during runs
Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce
Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers
Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
Reuse tests from repository for any test set run
Test Set Permutations N/A
Issue management
Independent issue management module
Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
Ability to report issues directly from emails
Batch editing
Integrations
Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems
Integration with Test Automation Tools
Integration with Source Control systems
Zapier
API
Slack integration
Webhooks
Customization
Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)
Custom Workflow
Custom fields and filters
Permissions & personalized mail notifications
Reporting
Customizable Graphs/Dashboards and reports
Scheduled reports
Additional features
Import & Export all data
Search (ability to add criteria)
External dashboard and embedding graphs
Cloud or Installed Cloud Both
Task Board
Security and certifications
Soc 2
ISO 27001
Service and Support
Service and Support

So, what is the verdict?

 

Both PractiTest and TestRail solutions are great tools for Agile oriented teams; have a variety of integration options with bug trackers, automation tools, API etc; and are easy to set up and use.

However, PractiTest offers more options for complex test management with advanced customizable workflow; unique data organization using Hierarchical filters; Traceability between requirements, tests and issues; external dashboards and more. All of the above means that PractiTest provides more insight and control of project progression with both pinpoint and broad resolution of all testing stages.

 

Another major differentiating factor between them is that while PractiTest is it’s own “stand alone” solution for the entire QA process, TestRail relays on external integrations to accomplish full testing coverage for both requirement management and Issue/ Bug management.

 

Why TestRail?

  • Relatively cheaper
  • Has both Cloud and Server solutions
  • Easy intuitive use

 

Why PractiTest?

  • Internal Requirements and Issue/bug management
  • Traceability between requirements, tests and issues
  • Unique Hierarchical filter tree to organize all project information and data
  • Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
  • Ability to report issues directly from emails
  • Integration with hundreds of third party tools via Zapier
  • SOC type II and ISO 27001 certificates

Want to learn more?

Sign up now to a free web session to choose the right test management tool