PractiTest Vs. TestRail

Searching for a QA management solution can be daunting and very time consuming. There are many testing tools to choose from with various features all promising to fulfill your testing demands.

PractiTest screenshot

TestRail screenshot

PractiTest and TestRail are both leading Test Management Solutions often considered by test teams looking to organize, upgrade and take charge of their testing process. The comparison below reviews the main features to take into account when considering which one of the two will best fit your QA needs.

PractiTest screenshot

TestRail screenshot

If you want one of our team members to walk you through this table and better explain different features and their importance, just click the button and set a meeting

PractiTest

TestRail

Requirement and User Stories Management

	Support for hierarchical requirements

Test case management

	Add attachments to each test step
	Clone Tests between projects
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reusable test repositories
	Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)

Test Sets and Execution Management

	Audit history of runs and results
	Edit tests during runs
	Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce
	Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers
	Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reuse tests from repository for any test set run
	Test Set Permutations		N/A

Issue management

	Independent issue management module
	Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
	Ability to report issues directly from emails
	Batch editing

Integrations

	Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems
	Integration with Test Automation Tools
	Integration with Source Control systems
	Zapier
	API
	Slack integration
	Webhooks

Customization

	Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)
	Custom Workflow
	Custom fields and filters
	Permissions & personalized mail notifications

Reporting

	Customizable Dashboards graphs, reports and metrics
	Scheduled reports

Additional features

Import & Export all data
Search (ability to add criteria)
External dashboard and embedding graphs
Cloud or Installed	Cloud	Both
Task Board

Security and certifications

	Soc 2
	ISO 27001

Service and Support

	Service and Support

“When I compare it to other solutions I’ve worked with before, I can say that PractiTest is much faster and is of better value.”

– Udi Vered, Zerto’s Director of QA

So, what is the verdict?

Both PractiTest and TestRail solutions are great tools for Agile oriented teams; have a variety of integration options with bug trackers, automation tools, API etc; and are easy to set up and use.

However, PractiTest offers more options for complex test management with advanced customizable workflow; unique data organization using Hierarchical filters; Traceability between requirements, tests and issues; external dashboards and more. All of the above means that PractiTest provides more insight and control of project progression with both pinpoint and broad resolution of all testing stages.

Another major differentiating factor between them is that while PractiTest is it’s own “stand alone” solution for the entire QA process, TestRail relays on external integrations to accomplish full testing coverage for both requirement management and Issue/ Bug management.

Why TestRail?

Relatively cheaper
Has both Cloud and Server solutions
Easy intuitive use

Why PractiTest?

Internal Requirements and Issue/bug management
Traceability between requirements, tests and issues
Unique Hierarchical filter tree to organize all project information and data
Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Ability to report issues directly from emails
Integration with hundreds of third party tools via Zapier
SOC type II and ISO 27001 certificates

PractiTest Vs. TestRail

So, what is the verdict?

Want to learn more?