HP ALM Vs. Xray

Deciding upon a Test Management tool is no easy task. There are many points to consider when searching in such a variety of test management solutions. Every tool out there will promise to be the best, which in fact is wrong. All the test management tools out there are great, but you need to choose the one that will be “best for you” and your QA process and demands.

To understand the full price of Jira Addons - click here

HP ALM screenshot

Xray screenshot

In order for your process and tool capabilities to align you need to first asses what your demands are. Testing coverage, integrations, customization, reporting and more.
The following comparison between Xray for Jira and HP ALM takes the main features that should be evaluated before decided on one of the two, or with other tools as well. These tools are very different in their essence, one is comprehnsive but heavy, and the other is light and is in fact a plugin that sits inside Atllasian's Jira

HP ALM screenshot

Xray screenshot

If you want better comparison between the tools you are checking, and the features available in other tools, please click below

HP ALM

Xray

See who is scored higher than HP ALM

See who is scored higher than Xray

Requirement and User Stories Management

	Support for hierarchical requirements

Test case management

	Add attachments to each test step
	Clone Tests between projects
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reusable test repositories
	Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)

Test Sets and Execution Management

Audit history of runs and results
Edit tests during runs
Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce
Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers
Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
Reuse tests from repository for any test set run
Test Set Permutations	N/A	N/A

Issue management

	Independent issue management module
	Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
	Ability to report issues directly from emails
	Batch editing

Integrations

	Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems
	Integration with Test Automation Tools
	Integration with Source Control systems
	Zapier
	API
	Slack integration
	Webhooks

Customization

	Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)
	Custom Workflow
	Custom fields and filters
	Permissions & personalized mail notifications

Reporting

	Customizable Dashboards graphs, reports and metrics
	Scheduled reports

Additional features

Import & Export all data		Only Import
Search (ability to add criteria)
External dashboard and embedding graphs
Cloud or Installed	Installed	Both
Task Board

Security and certifications

	Soc 2
	ISO 27001

Service and Support

	Service and Support

Compare HP ALM to PractiTest

Compare Xray to PractiTest

Avijit Amitabh, Alstorm Test Delivery Manager

“We evaluated 9 tools, but PractiTest stood apart from others based on ease of use and their advanced integration features. The advanced easy-to-implement reporting features provide live transparency for management to get a clear picture of test status. The pricing is also quite competitive when compared with other major players in this domain.”

– Avijit Amitabh, Test Delivery Manager, Alstom

Didn’t find what you are looking for?

Try this dynamic comparison tool