PractiTest vs. TestLodge

You have either been assigned or have decided on your own, that it is time to use a designated test management tool to take control of your QA. Or perhaps, your are struggling with your current solution/s and are looking to shift to a more compatible testing software solution. Finding the ‘best fit’ is not a simple task, and it requires you to evaluate at least a couple of solutions, some of which seem too similar to make an educated decision.

PractiTest screenshot

TestLodge screenshot

The following comparison between PractiTest and TestLodge test management tools, will point out the similarities and differences of key features that should be a part of your evaluation process. The end goal is to choose the best suited software testing solution for your QA process.

PractiTest screenshot

TestLodge screenshot

Ready to unlock the full potential of PractiTest? Click the button below to start your exclusive 14-day trial and experience the benefits firsthand.

PractiTest

TestLodge

Requirement and User Stories Management

	Support for hierarchical requirements

Test case management

	Add attachments to each test step
	Clone Tests between projects
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reusable test repositories
	Exploratory Testing module (session based testing)

Test Sets and Execution Management

	Audit history of runs and results
	Edit tests during runs
	Report issues/bugs from tests and auto-populate tests to reproduce
	Assignment of Cycles and Tests to testers
	Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
	Batch operations (cloning, editing, deletion)
	Reuse tests from repository for any test set run
	Test Set Permutations		N/A

Issue management

	Independent issue management module
	Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
	Batch editing

Time-Based Testing Iterations Management

	Milestones/Releases Management

Integrations

	Integration with 3rd party Bug Tracking systems
	Integration with Test Automation Tools
	Integration with Source Control systems
	Zapier
	API
	Slack integration
	Webhooks

Customization

	Hierarchical filters to organize information (e.g. Test Tree, Bug categories, Requirement types)
	Custom Workflow
	Custom fields and filters
	Permissions & personalized mail notifications

Reporting

	Customizable Dashboards graphs, reports and metrics
	Scheduled reports

AI-Powered Test Management

	Test Steps Creation
	Test Steps Editing
	Assigning a Score to Reflect Test Value

Additional Features

Import & Export all data
Search (ability to add criteria)
External dashboard and embedding graphs
Cloud or Installed	Cloud	Cloud
Task Board

Security and Certifications

	Soc 2
	ISO 27001

Service and Support

	Service and Support

“We evaluated several different test management platforms and chose PractiTest as our company standard. We are now consolidating our various test management systems into PractiTest.”

– Arthur Meloy, VP Site Reliability Engineering at NCR

So, what is the verdict?

Both PractiTest and TestLodge offer test case management abilities. However, while PractiTest is a complete end-to-end solution for the entire QA management process, TestLodge does not offer built-in issue management, and is lacking import abilities in requirement management. This is a major difference that can not be overlooked, and gives PractiTest a big advantage.

Also worth noting is the lack of Zapier integration for with TestLodge. This too is a fault to consider, as the trend of more test automation along with functional testing is on the rise.

PractiTest also offers many additional features such as: external dashboards, hierarchical filters for organizing your information, advanced search capabilities and a kanban task board, all of which improve the workflow and provide a more intuitive and insightful QA management process.

Testlodge, however is a better solution for small teams looking for a tool with limited budget.

PractiTest vs. TestLodge

So, what is the verdict?

Want to learn more?