Zephyr Vs. TestLodge

test management tool ultimate comparison

2018 Test Management Tool Comparison: Zephyr Vs. TestLodge

 

It’s not a simple task, trying to decide upon a Test Management tool. While Zephyr and TestLodge are both good choices for a Test management solution, it is important to choose the solution that will bets fit your QA process.

Use the comparison below to better understand their similarities and differences so you can make an educated decision. If you need some guidance as what you must take notice of when comparing testing tools refer to this helpful checklist.

Zephyr TestLodge
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology: check
Partial
Customization
Partial
There are customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
check
Reporting check check
Requirement Management check check
Test case management check check
Test Set and Execution Management check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Issue management (with internal issues module) check
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
cross
Integration with Bug trackers check check
Zapier integration cross cross
Custom internal Jenkins plugin cross cross
Ability to integrate with API check check
Service and Support check check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
check cross
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
check cross
Activity feed cross check
  • Cloud or Installed
Both
Cloud only
  • Discussion forum
check check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
cross cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
cross cross

Training and methodology

  • Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
check check
  • Training for users and administrators available
check check
  • Methodological consultation
check check

Pricing

Not Found
Not Found
Zephyr TestLodge
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology:
qTest check
TestLodge
Partial
Customization
qTest
Partial
There are customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
TestLodge check
Reporting
qTest check
TestLodge check
Requirement Management
qTest check
TestLodge check
Test case management
qTest check
TestLodge check
Test Set and Execution Management
qTest check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
TestLodge check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Issue management (with internal issues module)
qTest check
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
TestLodge cross
Integration with Bug trackers
qTest check
TestLodge check
Zapier integration
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
Custom internal Jenkins plugin
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
Ability to integrate with API
qTest check
TestLodge check
Service and Support
qTest check
TestLodge check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
qTest check
TestLodge cross
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
qTest check
TestLodge cross
Activity feed
qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • Cloud or Installed
qTest
Both
TestLodge
Cloud only
  • Discussion forum
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
qTest cross
TestLodge cross

Training and methodology

  • Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Training for users and administrators available
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Methodological consultation
qTest check
TestLodge check

Pricing

qTest
Not Found
TestLodge
Not Found

 

Compare PractiTest to TestLodge>>

Compare PractiTest to Zephyr>>

For PractiTest free trial >>

 

*Disclaimer: Comparison research conducted by PractiTest marketing department. Any updates can be sent to: info@practitest.com