Zephyr Vs. QAComplete

test management tool ultimate comparison

2018 Test Management Tool Comparison: Zephyr Vs. QAComplete

Even once you have decided that you need a Test Management tool, it’s not obvious how to choose one. With such a variety of testing tools it’s hard to know which one will deliver on what they promise. Our best advice is to realize that there is no “one right” solution, there is only the “right tool for you”. Meaning, the testing tool that you should work with, depends on the should have functionalities your QA process demands.

If you have already narrowed it down between two options: Zephyr vs. QA Complete then the following comparison should help you understand which of the two might be a better fit.

Zephyr QAComplete
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology: check check
Customization check
Partial
There are customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
Customizable graphs are available only On-Premise
Reporting check check
*see comment above
Requirement Management check check
Test case management check check
Test Set and Execution Management check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
check
Issue management check
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
check
no ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
Ability to report issues directly from emails
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
check check
Service and Support check check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
check check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
check cross
  • Cloud or Installed
Both
Both
  • Discussion forum
check cross
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
cross cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
cross cross

Training and methodology

  • Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
check check
  • Training for users and administrators available
check check
  • Methodological consultation
check check

Pricing

Not publicly available
€647 - each year per concurrent user (SaaS) €1,067 - each year per concurrent user (On-Premise)
Zephyr QAComplete
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology:
qTest check
TestLodge check
Customization
qTest check
Partial
There are customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
TestLodge
Customizable graphs are available only On-Premise
Reporting
qTest check
TestLodge check
*see comment above
Requirement Management
qTest check
TestLodge check
Test case management
qTest check
TestLodge check
Test Set and Execution Management
qTest check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
check
Issue management
qTest check
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
TestLodge check
no ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
Ability to report issues directly from emails
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
qTest check
TestLodge check
Service and Support
qTest check
TestLodge check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
qTest check
TestLodge cross
  • Cloud or Installed
qTest
Both
TestLodge
Both
  • Discussion forum
qTest check
TestLodge cross
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
qTest cross
TestLodge cross

Training and methodology

  • Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Training for users and administrators available
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Methodological consultation
qTest check
TestLodge check

Pricing

qTest
Not publicly available
TestLodge
€647 - each year per concurrent user (SaaS) €1,067 - each year per concurrent user (On-Premise)

 

Compare PractiTest to Zephyr>>

Compare PractiTest to QA Complete>>

For PractiTest free trial >>

 

*Disclaimer: Comparison research conducted by PractiTest marketing department. Any updates can be sent to: info@practitest.com