Zephyr Vs. HP ALM

test management tool ultimate comparison

2018 Test Management Tool Comparison: Zephyr Vs. HP ALM (Quality Center)

If you have arrived here, it means you are trying to decide upon a Test Management tool. No doubt you have done some preliminary research, and are now trying to decide between Zephyr or HP’s Quality Center solutions. This is a great opportunity to use our checklist as a guide to help you in your decision process.

Zephyr and HP’s Quality Center are both viable Test management solutions. However, below you’ll see the comparison of their feature similarities and differences you should take notice of when considering which one of the two will best fit your current QA methodology.

Zephyr HP Quality Center
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology: check check
Customization
Partial
There are customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
check
Reporting check check
Requirement Management check check
Test case management check check
Test Set and Execution Management check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
check
No batch cloning
Issue management check
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
check
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
check check
Service and Support check check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
check check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
check cross
  • Cloud or Installed
Both
Both
  • Discussion forum
check check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
cross cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
cross check

Training and methodology

  • Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
check check
  • Training for users and administrators available
check check
  • Methodological consultation
check check

Pricing

Not publicly available
Not publicly available
Zephyr HP Quality Center
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology:
qTest check
TestLodge check
Customization
qTest
Partial
There are customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
TestLodge check
Reporting
qTest check
TestLodge check
Requirement Management
qTest check
TestLodge check
Test case management
qTest check
TestLodge check
Test Set and Execution Management
qTest check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
TestLodge check
No batch cloning
Issue management
qTest check
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
TestLodge check
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
qTest check
TestLodge check
Service and Support
qTest check
TestLodge check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
qTest check
TestLodge cross
  • Cloud or Installed
qTest
Both
TestLodge
Both
  • Discussion forum
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
qTest cross
TestLodge check

Training and methodology

  • Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Training for users and administrators available
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Methodological consultation
qTest check
TestLodge check

Pricing

qTest
Not publicly available
TestLodge
Not publicly available

 

Compare PractiTest to HP’s ALM>>

Compare PractiTest to Zephyr>>

For PractiTest free trial >>

 

*Disclaimer: Comparison research conducted by PractiTest marketing department. Any updates can be sent to: info@practitest.com