TestRail Vs. Zephyr

test management tool ultimate comparison

2018 Test Management Tool Comparison: TestRail Vs. Zephyr

When faced with the challenge of choosing a Test Management tool, it can be hard to figure out where to start, since there are so many available options. The important rule of thumb is to choose a tool that will best match your QA process and it’s demands. The tool you use should “work for you” and not the other way around. There is a useful checklist of features you can use while evaluating different testing tools here.

If you have already narrowed it down between two options: TestRail vs. Zephyr, then the following comparison table sums up the most important features to take note of, as well as strengths and weaknesses of each tool.

 

TestRail Zephyr
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology: cross check
Customization check
Not of workflow
Partial
There are customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
Reporting check check
  • Requirement Management
cross check
  • Test case management
check
No Traceability between Tests and Requirements
check
  • Test Sets and Execution Management
check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Issue management: cross check
  • Flexible issue management mechanism
cross check
  • Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
cross

Using external bug tracker

cross
  • Ability to report issues directly from emails
cross cross
  • Batch editing
check check
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
check check
Service and Support check
24/7
check
24/5

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
check check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
cross check
  • Cloud or Installed
Both
Both
  • Discussion forum
check check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
cross cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
check cross

Training and methodology

Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies check check
Training for users and administrators available check check
Methodological consultation check check

Pricing

25$ per user
Not publicly available
TestRail Zephyr
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology:
qTest cross
TestLodge check
Customization
qTest check
Not of workflow
TestLodge
Partial
There are customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
Reporting
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Requirement Management
qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • Test case management
qTest check
No Traceability between Tests and Requirements
TestLodge check
  • Test Sets and Execution Management
qTest check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
TestLodge check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
Issue management:
qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • Flexible issue management mechanism
qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
qTest cross

Using external bug tracker

TestLodge cross
  • Ability to report issues directly from emails
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
  • Batch editing
qTest check
TestLodge check
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
qTest check
TestLodge check
Service and Support
qTest check
24/7
TestLodge check
24/5

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • Cloud or Installed
qTest
Both
TestLodge
Both
  • Discussion forum
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
qTest check
TestLodge cross

Training and methodology

Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
qTest check
TestLodge check
Training for users and administrators available
qTest check
TestLodge check
Methodological consultation
qTest check
TestLodge check

Pricing

qTest
25$ per user
TestLodge
Not publicly available

 

Compare PractiTest to Testrail>>

Compare PractiTest to Zephyr>>

For PractiTest free trial >>

 

*Disclaimer: Comparison research conducted by PractiTest marketing department. Any updates can be sent to: info@practitest.com