TestRail Vs. QA Complete

test management tool ultimate comparison

2018 Test Management Tool Comparison: TestRail Vs. QA Complete

While It is clear to you that you need a Test Management tool to help manage your QA process, what isn’t clear is how to choose one. There are so many testing tools all claiming to be the best, it’s hard to know which one will deliver on that promise. The truth is there is no “best tool”, there is only the “best tool for you”. Meaning, when trying to decide which testing tool you should work with, depends on the “must have” functionalities your QA process demands.

If you have already narrowed it down between two options: TestRail vs. QA Complete then the following comparison should help you understand which of the two might be a better fit.

TestRail QAComplete
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology: cross check
  • Requirement Management
cross check
  • Test case management
check
No Traceability between Tests and Requirements
check
  • Test Set and Execution Management
check check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
  • Issue/ Bug management
check
ONLY via external integration with bug trackers
check
no ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
Ability to report issues directly from emails
  • Traceability between requirements, tests and issues
cross check
Customization check
Not of workflow
check
Customizable graphs are available only On-Premise
Reporting check check
* see remark above
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
check check
Service and Support check check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
check check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
cross cross
  • Cloud or Installed
Both
Both
  • Discussion forum
check cross
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
cross cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
check cross

Training and methodology

Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies check check
Training for users and administrators available check check
Methodological consultation check check

Pricing

25$ per user
€647 - each year per concurrent user (SaaS)
€1,067 - each year per concurrent user (On-Premise)
TestRail QAComplete
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology:
qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • Requirement Management
qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • Test case management
qTest check
No Traceability between Tests and Requirements
TestLodge check
  • Test Set and Execution Management
qTest check
TestLodge check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
  • Issue/ Bug management
qTest check
ONLY via external integration with bug trackers
TestLodge check
no ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues
Ability to report issues directly from emails
  • Traceability between requirements, tests and issues
qTest cross
TestLodge check
Customization
qTest check
Not of workflow
TestLodge check
Customizable graphs are available only On-Premise
Reporting
qTest check
TestLodge check
* see remark above
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
qTest check
TestLodge check
Service and Support
qTest check
TestLodge check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
  • Cloud or Installed
qTest
Both
TestLodge
Both
  • Discussion forum
qTest check
TestLodge cross
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
qTest check
TestLodge cross

Training and methodology

Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
qTest check
TestLodge check
Training for users and administrators available
qTest check
TestLodge check
Methodological consultation
qTest check
TestLodge check

Pricing

qTest
25$ per user
TestLodge
€647 - each year per concurrent user (SaaS)
€1,067 - each year per concurrent user (On-Premise)

 

Compare PractiTest to Testrail>>

Compare PractiTest to QA Complete>>

For PractiTest free trial >>

 

*Disclaimer: Comparison research conducted by PractiTest marketing department. Any updates can be sent to: info@practitest.com