If you’ve tried to calculate what Qase will actually cost your team (will 1,000 AIDEN credits last a week or a month? will read-only seats at $2–5/month add up fast?), you already know the problem. You’re balancing seats, credits, and add-ons before you’ve run a single test.
Qase serves customers including SUSE, Rakuten, Asana, and Crypto.com. It combines test case management, execution tracking, and its AIDEN AI engine in one workspace with 35+ integrations into Jira, GitHub, and CI/CD pipelines. But as Qase has evolved into an AI-driven platform with credit systems, tiered storage limits, and paid add-ons for SSO and data retention, its pricing takes real work to decode.
We’ve analyzed Qase’s pricing tiers, AIDEN credit system, and add-on costs. Qase is a good choice if:
- You want a clean UI that speeds up onboarding
- Your team needs AI-assisted test automation without writing code
- You value easy test case import and fast migration from other tools
- You need affordable read-only seats for non-QA stakeholders
- Your team is between 5 and 100 users with standard compliance needs
Qase’s pricing might not be a good choice if:
- You need to customize test workflows, statuses, and field schemas
- Your organization requires SSO/SAML without paying for add-ons or upgrading to Enterprise
- You manage multiple bug tracker integrations across different projects in a single account
- You need embeddable dashboards and external reporting for stakeholders who don’t hold any seat
- You want AI included without a credit system that resets monthly
In this case, consider PractiTest: an end-to-end test management platform built around traceability and enterprise reporting, where SmartFox AI is included in every plan without credit limits, dashboards can be shared externally via public URLs without requiring any seat, and custom workflows give QA leaders full control over their testing process. With two years of SmartFox AI in production across thousands of customers worldwide, PractiTest works as a centralized QA hub that doesn’t lock teams into any single ecosystem.
That’s why we’ve included a detailed pricing comparison with PractiTest in this review.
Qase Pricing Summary
| Qase | PractiTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | • $0/month • 3 users, 2 projects • 500 MB storage • No integrations or dashboards | • No free plan • 14-day free trial (no credit card) • Full Team plan features |
| Entry Plan | • Startup: $30/user/mo ($24 annual) • 3–20 users • 1,000 AIDEN credits/mo • 100 GB storage, 90-day history | • Team: $54/user/mo ($49 annual) • 5+ users • SmartFox AI included (no credits) • Unlimited projects |
| Mid-Tier | • Business: $36/user/mo ($30 annual) • 5–100 users • 2,000 AIDEN credits/mo • RBAC, test case review, QQL | • Corporate: Custom pricing • 10+ users • SSO/SAML, MFA, audit logs • Different bug trackers per project |
| Enterprise | • Custom pricing • 20+ users, annual only • 4,000 AIDEN credits/mo • SSO, SCIM, dedicated CSM | • Corporate (same tier) • SSO/SAML included • Custom workflows • Priority support |
| Best For | Teams wanting a clean UI with AI-assisted automation and easy onboarding | QA leaders needing enterprise traceability, unlimited AI, and external dashboard sharing |
Qase Pricing: In-Depth Overview
Qase uses a per-seat, per-month pricing model with four tiers: Free, Startup, Business, and Enterprise.
Annual billing saves 20% on all paid plans. Beyond base subscriptions, Qase charges for AIDEN AI credits (with overages), add-ons for SSO and data retention, and read-only stakeholder seats. The platform targets everyone from small teams replacing spreadsheets to enterprise QA organizations needing compliance certifications and dedicated support.
Here’s what each tier actually costs.
Qase Free Plan: $0/month
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Price | $0/month |
| Users | Up to 3 |
| Projects | 2 |
| Storage | 500 MB |
| Test History | 30 days |
| API Results | 25,000/month |
The Free plan gives very small teams or individuals a permanent, no-credit-card tier. It includes basic test case management and test runs but excludes dashboards, integrations, custom fields, and AIDEN AI credits. Test history disappears after 30 days, which rules it out for any team that needs audit trails or trend analysis.
| Free Plan Pros | Free Plan Cons |
|---|---|
| ✅ No credit card required | ❌ Only 3 users, 2 projects |
| ✅ Permanent, no time limit | ❌ No integrations at all |
| ✅ Basic test case management | ❌ No dashboards or reporting |
| ✅ Good for individual evaluation | ❌ 30-day history loses data |
The Bottom Line 👉 The Free plan works for solo testers exploring Qase, but no integrations and 30-day history make it impractical for real QA work.
Qase Startup Plan: $30/user/month or $24/user/month annually
| Feature | Monthly | Annual | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Price | $30/user | $24/user | 20% savings |
| Users | 3–20 | 3–20 | Regular seats |
| Read-Only Users | $5/user/mo | $4/user/mo | View and comment only |
| AIDEN Credits | 1,000/month | 1,000/month | Do not roll over |
| Storage | 100 GB | 100 GB | Shared across projects |
| Test History | 90 days | 90 days | Extendable via add-on |
The Startup plan is Qase’s entry point for professional teams. It unlocks unlimited test runs and projects, dashboards, reporting, 35+ integrations, custom fields, and 1,000 AIDEN AI credits per month. Test history defaults to 90 days; older execution data disappears unless you buy the data retention add-on. Read-only seats at $5/month (or $4 annual) keep stakeholder access affordable.
| Startup Plan Pros | Startup Plan Cons |
|---|---|
| ✅ Unlimited projects and runs | ❌ 90-day test history limit |
| ✅ 35+ integrations unlocked | ❌ No RBAC or test case review |
| ✅ 1,000 AIDEN credits included | ❌ Credits don’t roll over |
| ✅ Affordable read-only seats | ❌ Max 20 users |
The Bottom Line 👉 Startup suits small QA teams that need integrations and basic AI automation, but the 90-day history and lack of RBAC push growing teams toward Business quickly.
Qase Business Plan: $36/user/month or $30/user/month annually
| Feature | Monthly | Annual | Increase from Startup |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Price | $36/user | $30/user | +20% |
| Users | 5–100 | 5–100 | 5x max capacity |
| Read-Only Users | $3/user/mo | $2/user/mo | 40% cheaper |
| AIDEN Credits | 2,000/month | 2,000/month | 2x Startup |
| Storage | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Test History | 1 year | 1 year | 4x Startup |
The Business plan adds governance: RBAC for access control, test case review workflows, Qase Query Language (QQL) for advanced filtering, requirements traceability reporting, and premium support (24/5 email and live chat). Read-only seats drop to $2–3/month, making stakeholder access cheaper at scale. SSO is not included; it requires a paid add-on at $4/user/month on top of the annual rate.
| Business Plan Pros | Business Plan Cons |
|---|---|
| ✅ RBAC and test case review | ❌ SSO costs extra ($4/user/mo add-on) |
| ✅ QQL for advanced queries | ❌ 1-year history still limited |
| ✅ Unlimited storage | ❌ AIDEN credits still reset monthly |
| ✅ Requirements traceability | ❌ Traceability limited to Jira and GitHub |
The Bottom Line 👉 Business fits mid-market QA teams, but the SSO add-on cost and credit system add complexity for teams expecting all-inclusive pricing.
Qase Enterprise Plan: Custom Pricing
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom, annual only |
| Minimum Users | 20 |
| SSO | SAML 2.0 included |
| SCIM | Included |
| AIDEN Credits | 4,000/month |
| Test History | Unlimited |
| Support | Dedicated CSM, SLA |
The Enterprise plan includes everything in Business plus SSO and SCIM provisioning as native features (not add-ons), unlimited data history, a dedicated Customer Success Manager, and a formal SLA. Dedicated cluster and custom domain options cost extra. This tier targets organizations with 20+ QA practitioners that need compliance certifications and guaranteed support response times.
| Enterprise Plan Pros | Enterprise Plan Cons |
|---|---|
| ✅ SSO and SCIM included | ❌ 20-user minimum |
| ✅ Unlimited data history | ❌ Annual commitment required |
| ✅ Dedicated CSM and SLA | ❌ Requires sales negotiation |
| ✅ 4,000 AIDEN credits/month | ❌ Credits still consumption-based |
The Bottom Line 👉 Enterprise makes sense for larger QA organizations needing compliance and dedicated support, but the 20-user minimum and annual lock-in shut out smaller teams with enterprise security needs.
Qase Add-On Costs and Hidden Fees
Beyond base subscriptions, Qase’s true costs emerge through several add-ons and overage mechanisms:
AIDEN AI Credit Overages:
- Credits reset monthly and do not roll over
- Over-usage is disabled by default; it must be manually enabled
- Extra credits cost $0.40 each
- An optional spending cap is available
- On annual plans, overages are billed at $300 cumulative thresholds
SSO Add-On (Business Plan):
- SSO requires a paid add-on for Business plan users
- $4/regular user/month on top of the $30 annual Business rate = $34/user/month total
- Only available on annual Business subscriptions
- Read-only users with SSO: $48/read-only user/year
Data Retention Add-On:
- Startup (90 days) and Business (1 year) defaults are extendable
- +5 years: $8/user/month ($96/user/year)
- +10 years: $12/user/month ($144/user/year)
- Data that expired before purchasing the add-on cannot be recovered
Read-Only Seats:
- Not free on any plan; range from $2 to $5/user/month depending on plan and billing cycle
Where Qase Falls Short
Qase offers a clean interface and real AI capabilities, but its pricing model and feature gating create problems for QA teams that want predictable costs and enterprise governance:
AIDEN Credit System Creates Cost Uncertainty
- Credits reset monthly and do not roll over, so unused credits are wasted
- Teams running heavy AI automation can exhaust allocations fast, triggering $0.40/credit overage charges
- The credit model forces teams to ration AI usage instead of applying it across all test cases
- No plan offers unlimited AI, so automation goals and budget stay in tension
SSO Gated Behind Enterprise or Paid Add-On
- Business plan teams must pay an additional $4/user/month for SSO, available only on annual billing
- This raises the Business plan cost to $34/user/month for security-conscious organizations
- Enterprise’s 20-user minimum excludes smaller teams that still need SSO
Limited Test History on Lower Tiers
- Startup retains only 90 days of execution data; Business retains 1 year
- Extending retention costs $8–12/user/month extra, and expired data cannot be recovered
- Teams in regulated industries need unlimited history, which requires Enterprise pricing
Reporting Customization Gaps
- Cross-project reporting requires manual setup for teams managing multiple products
- Requirements traceability is limited to Jira and GitHub only
- No way to embed dashboard widgets in external portals or share dashboards without a paid seat
These limitations have led many QA leaders to explore alternatives that offer unlimited AI, deeper traceability, and more flexible reporting…
Best Qase Alternative: PractiTest
PractiTest provides end-to-end test management built around traceability, business impact analysis, and AI that works without credit constraints.
If Qase’s credit-based AI, SSO add-on costs, limited test history, and reporting restrictions frustrate you, PractiTest addresses each gap directly. SmartFox AI is included in every plan without usage limits. Dashboards can be shared externally via public URLs with no seats required. A single data model connects requirements, tests, runs, and defects in one traceability chain that extends to business impact analysis.
Founded in 2008 and bootstrapped without external funding, PractiTest serves thousands of customers worldwide as a centralized QA hub that doesn’t lock teams into any single ecosystem. The platform stores all testing data internally, even when integrated with external tools, so teams never lose their testing history when changing tools.
Named in Forrester’s Autonomous Testing Platforms Landscape, Q3 2025, and demonstrated 312% ROI in a Forrester Total Economic Impact study – PractiTest fits mid-market to enterprise QA teams managing thousands of tests across multiple teams and tools, organizations in regulated industries needing audit trails and compliance documentation, and QA leaders who need to present quality metrics to non-QA stakeholders without purchasing additional seats.
PractiTest also provides migration tools for teams moving from TestRail and HP ALM/Quality Center.
PractiTest Team Plan: $54/user/month ($49/user/month annual)
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Price | $54/user/month ($49/user/month annual) |
| Minimum Users | 5 tester licenses |
| Modules | Requirements, Test Library, Test Sets & Runs, Issues, Milestones |
| SmartFox AI | Included (no credits) |
| Comment Users | 5 per tester license |
| Projects | Unlimited |
| Bug Tracker | Single integration |
Unlike Qase’s credit-gated AI, PractiTest’s Team plan includes the full SmartFox AI suite without usage limits.
With two years in production, SmartFox delivers three AI capabilities: duplicate test and issue detection that alerts users to similar existing entities in real time, step generator to suggest step to scripted tests and test generator that create structured tests from Jira or Azure DevOps user stories, and test value score that prioritizes which tests to run, skip, or retire based on risk and historical data.
The 5 Comment Users per tester license gives stakeholders visibility at no extra cost, compared to Qase’s $2–5/month per read-only seat.
| Team Plan Pros | Team Plan Cons |
|---|---|
| ✅ SmartFox AI with no credit limits | ❌ Single bug tracker integration |
| ✅ Free Comment Users for stakeholders | ❌ No SSO (Corporate only) |
| ✅ End-to-end traceability across five modules | |
| ✅ External dashboard sharing via URL |
The Bottom Line 👉 The Team plan provides more governance and unlimited AI than Qase’s Startup or Business tiers, with free stakeholder access that Qase charges for. The learning curve is steeper, but that depth pays off as teams scale.
PractiTest Corporate Plan: Custom Pricing
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom, quote required |
| Minimum Users | 10 tester licenses |
| SSO/SAML | Included |
| MFA Enforcement | Included |
| Comment Users | 10 per tester license |
| Bug Trackers | Different trackers per project in the same account |
| Support | Priority/premium |
The Corporate plan adds enterprise security (SSO/SAML, MFA enforcement, audit logs), the ability to assign different bug trackers to different projects within the same account (one project using Jira, another using Azure DevOps, a third using ClickUp, all under one PractiTest account), custom test workflows with controlled state transitions, MCP integration for AI assistants, Test Versioning, and the Test Value Score.
Comment Users double to 10 per tester license, giving broad organizational visibility. Compare this to Qase, where SSO on the Business plan costs an extra $4/user/month, and Enterprise requires a 20-user minimum.
| Corporate Plan Pros | Corporate Plan Cons |
|---|---|
| ✅ SSO/SAML included (no add-on) | ❌ 10-user minimum |
| ✅ Different bug trackers per project | ❌ SaaS-only, no on-premises |
| ✅ Custom workflows and state transitions | |
| ✅ 10 Comment Users per license |
The Bottom Line 👉 Corporate provides enterprise governance without the add-on costs and user minimums that make Qase’s Enterprise tier inaccessible to mid-sized teams.
PractiTest Additional Costs
PractiTest’s pricing includes some additional cost considerations:
Payment Processing Fee: A $50 processing fee applies to any payment under $10,000, which affects smaller teams on monthly billing.
No Credit System for AI: SmartFox AI features (duplicate detection, test step suggestions, and test value scoring) are included without per-action credits on both Team and Corporate plans.
Qase Feature Value Breakdown (vs PractiTest)
AI Capabilities and Pricing Model
Qase’s Approach: AIDEN covers test generation, automation readiness scoring, manual-to-automated conversion, cloud execution, and failure debugging.
It runs on a credit system where each AI action consumes credits from a monthly allocation (1,000–4,000, depending on plan). Credits do not roll over, and overages cost $0.40 each. Teams must decide which test cases get AI attention, which creates a rationing dynamic.
PractiTest’s Approach: SmartFox AI is included in every plan without usage credits.
Refined over two years of production use, SmartFox addresses three testing challenges: duplicate test and issue detection runs in real time during test creation to prevent redundancy, test step suggestions generate structured tests from Jira user stories, and test value scoring prioritizes which tests to run, skip, or retire using ML-based analysis of risk and historical data. With no credits to manage, teams use AI freely across their entire test library.
🪙 Value Verdict: PractiTest is better for teams wanting unrestricted AI across their testing workflow, while Qase’s AIDEN offers deeper automation (code generation, cloud execution) for teams willing to manage credit consumption.
Stakeholder Visibility and Reporting
Qase’s Approach: Qase provides customizable dashboards with five widget types, QQL for advanced queries, and shareable read-only links.
But accessing dashboards requires at least a read-only seat ($2–5/month per user). Requirements traceability reporting is limited to Jira and GitHub. Cross-project reporting requires manual setup according to user feedback.
PractiTest’s Approach: PractiTest uses separate engines for reports and dashboards. Dashboards provide high-level overviews and can be shared externally via public URLs without requiring any seat or login.
Individual dashboard items can be embedded as iframes into company wikis, Confluence pages, or any web portal, updating every five minutes. The reports engine offers drill-down analysis that can be scheduled (daily, weekly, monthly), re-run to track changes over time, and downloaded with historical versions preserved. Comment Users (5–10 per tester license, included free) provide additional read-and-comment access.
🪙 Value Verdict: PractiTest is better for organizations needing broad stakeholder visibility without per-seat costs. It offers free external sharing with embeddable, live-updating dashboards that Qase charges for at every level.
Enterprise Security and Compliance
Qase’s Approach: SSO is included on Enterprise (20+ users) but requires a paid add-on on Business ($4/user/month, annual only). SCIM provisioning is Enterprise-only. Qase holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and GDPR compliance, with annual penetration testing. Data retention defaults to 90 days (Startup) or 1 year (Business) and requires paid add-ons to extend.
PractiTest’s Approach: SSO/SAML and MFA enforcement are included in the Corporate plan without add-on charges.
PractiTest holds SOC 2 Type II (audited by Ernst & Young) and ISO 27001 certification, supports HIPAA with Business Associate Agreements, and undergoes annual penetration testing following OWASP methodology. The Corporate plan’s minimum is 10 users versus Qase Enterprise’s 20.
PractiTest also stores all testing data within the platform, even when synced with external tools, so enterprises keep full data portability if they change tools.
🪙 Value Verdict: PractiTest is better for regulated organizations needing SSO without add-on fees and HIPAA compliance, with a lower entry threshold (10 users vs. 20) for enterprise security features and full data independence from external tool ecosystems.
Traceability and Test Library Architecture
Qase’s Approach: Qase organizes tests in suites with three views (Nested Tree, Folder, Mind Map beta) and supports parameterized cases, shared steps (including workspace-level global shared steps), and test case review workflows.
Requirements traceability links test cases to Jira or GitHub issues with a dedicated report. G2 reviewers note limited workflow customization compared to enterprise incumbents.
PractiTest’s Approach: PractiTest’s test instance architecture separates test definitions (library) from execution contexts (instances in Test Sets), allowing write-once, run-anywhere reuse where a single library edit propagates to all linked Test Sets automatically.
The platform supports four test types in a single library (Scripted, Exploratory, BDD, Automated), custom workflows with controlled state transitions (Corporate), and full requirement-to-test-to-defect traceability with bidirectional Jira sync that syncs custom Jira filters with real-time updates and provides a panel within the Jira UI showing test status, issues, and coverage. PractiTest also integrates with Azure DevOps, ClickUp, and others.
Beyond linking, PractiTest’s closed-loop traceability enables business impact analysis: when a bug surfaces, teams can immediately identify which requirements are affected, what tests cover those requirements, and the business impact of rolling back features.
Tag-based organization with custom fields and dynamic filters gives instant access to any subset of tests (all regression tests that are ready, all automation tests for a specific sprint, or any combination) without reorganizing data into folder hierarchies.
🪙 Value Verdict: PractiTest is better for teams managing large test libraries across multiple projects, offering deeper workflow customization, business impact traceability, and a dynamic organization model that removes the limits of folder-based structures.
Final Verdict: Qase vs PractiTest
The choice between Qase and PractiTest depends on your team’s priorities and testing maturity:
👍 Qase is a test management platform built for teams that value fast onboarding and AI-assisted automation.
With pricing from free to custom enterprise rates, it lets QA teams start quickly, connect to 35+ tools, and use AIDEN to convert manual tests into automated ones without writing code. Its credit-based pricing model works best for teams of 5–100 users with standard compliance needs, organizations prioritizing fast adoption over customization, and QA engineers who want AI to handle the manual-to-automated conversion bottleneck.
👉 PractiTest is an end-to-end test management platform built for QA leaders who need to connect requirements, tests, and defects in a single auditable chain while presenting quality metrics to stakeholders across the organization.
It includes SmartFox AI without credit limits (with two years of production refinement delivering duplicate detection, test step suggestions, and test value scoring), offers free external dashboard sharing with embeddable widgets, provides enterprise security without add-on fees on the Corporate plan, and maintains full data independence from any single tool ecosystem. PractiTest has a steeper learning curve than Qase, but that depth becomes necessary at scale.
This approach makes it a strong fit for mid-market to enterprise QA teams in regulated industries, organizations needing broad stakeholder visibility without per-seat costs, and QA leaders who want full workflow customization with AI assistance on every test.
Get started with a free 14-day PractiTest trial here.
The difference is not just features but philosophy. Qase asks, “How can we make test management modern and AI-accessible?” PractiTest asks, “How can we give QA leaders complete traceability and visibility across the organization without locking them into any single ecosystem?”
Qase Pricing FAQ
Is Qase free to use?
Qase offers a permanent free plan for up to 3 users and 2 projects with 500 MB storage and a 30-day test history. It excludes integrations, dashboards, custom fields, and AIDEN AI credits, making it suitable only for individual evaluation. A 14-day free trial of the Business plan is also available without a credit card.
How much does Qase cost per user?
Startup costs $30/user/month ($24 annual), Business costs $36/user/month ($30 annual), and Enterprise requires custom pricing with a 20-user minimum. Read-only seats range from $2–5/month depending on plan and billing cycle. Adding SSO to Business costs an additional $4/user/month.
Do Qase AIDEN credits roll over?
No. AIDEN credits reset monthly and do not carry forward. Startup plans receive 1,000 credits, Business receives 2,000, and Enterprise receives 4,000. Exceeding your allocation costs $0.40 per credit. An optional spending cap can prevent unexpected charges.
Does Qase include SSO on all plans?
No. SSO (SAML 2.0) is included only on the Enterprise plan (20+ users). Business plan teams can add SSO at $4/user/month, but only on annual subscriptions with a minimum of 5 users. Startup and Free plans have no SSO option.
PractiTest includes SSO/SAML on its Corporate plan without add-on charges.
How long does Qase keep test data?
Free retains 30 days, Startup retains 90 days, Business retains 1 year, and Enterprise offers unlimited retention. Startup and Business teams can extend retention to 5 years ($8/user/month) or 10 years ($12/user/month) via a paid add-on. Data that expired before purchasing the add-on cannot be recovered.
Which is cheaper: Qase or PractiTest?
Per seat at the entry level, Qase Startup ($24–30/user/month) costs less than PractiTest Team ($49–54/user/month), but PractiTest includes unlimited AI usage, free Comment Users for stakeholders (5 per license), and external dashboard sharing at no extra cost.
When you factor in Qase’s read-only seat fees, SSO add-ons, data retention extensions, and AIDEN credit overages, the total cost difference narrows or reverses depending on team size and needs.
What integrations does Qase support?
Qase supports 35+ integrations, including two-way sync with Jira Cloud, Jira Server/Data Center, GitHub, and Azure DevOps, plus connections to GitLab, Asana, ClickUp, Linear, Slack, and CI/CD tools. Test framework reporters are available as open-source packages for Playwright, Cypress, pytest, JUnit, and others. Requirements traceability reporting works only with Jira and GitHub.