qTest Vs. HP’s ALM – Quality Center

test management tool ultimate comparison

2018 Test Management Tool Comparison: qTest Vs. HP’s ALM (Quality Center)

Deciding upon a Test Management tool is no easy task. There are many points to consider when searching in such a variety of test management solutions. Every tool out there will promise to be the best, which in fact is wrong. All the test management tools out there are great, but you need to choose the one that will be “best for you” and your QA process and demands.

In order for your process and tool capabilities to align you need to first asses what your demands are. Testing coverage, integrations, customization, reporting and more.

The following comparison between qTest and HP’s Quality Center takes the main features that should be evaluated before decided on one of the two, or with other tools as well.

qTest HP Quality Center
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology: check check
Customization check check
Issue Workflow cross check
Reporting check check
Requirement Management check check
Test case management check check
Test Set and Execution Management check check
No batch cloning
Issue Management check
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues

-No Ability to report issues directly from emails
check
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
check check
Service and Support check check

Additional features:

cross check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
check cross
  • Cloud or Installed
Both
Both
  • Discussion forum
cross check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
cross cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
check check

Training and methodology

Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies check check
Training for users and administrators available check check
Methodological consultation check check

Pricing

By request
By request
qTest HP Quality Center
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology:
qTest check
TestLodge check
Customization
qTest check
TestLodge check
Issue Workflow
qTest cross
TestLodge check
Reporting
qTest check
TestLodge check
Requirement Management
qTest check
TestLodge check
Test case management
qTest check
TestLodge check
Test Set and Execution Management
qTest check
TestLodge check
No batch cloning
Issue Management
qTest check
No Ability to detect and prevent duplicate issues

-No Ability to report issues directly from emails
TestLodge check
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
qTest check
TestLodge check
Service and Support
qTest check
TestLodge check

Additional features:

qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
qTest check
TestLodge cross
  • Cloud or Installed
qTest
Both
TestLodge
Both
  • Discussion forum
qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
qTest cross
TestLodge cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
qTest check
TestLodge check

Training and methodology

Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
qTest check
TestLodge check
Training for users and administrators available
qTest check
TestLodge check
Methodological consultation
qTest check
TestLodge check

Pricing

qTest
By request
TestLodge
By request

 

Compare PractiTest to qTest>>

Compare PractiTest to Quality Center>>

For PractiTest free trial >>

 

*Disclaimer: Comparison research conducted by PractiTest marketing department. Any updates can be sent to: info@practitest.com