PractiTest Vs. Zephyr

test management tool ultimate comparison

2018 Test Management Tool Comparison: PractiTest Vs. Zephyr

If you are in search of a Test management tool, you now are aware of how wide the variety of tools available to choose from is. This task can be intimidating faced head-on, which is why it’s best to start by comparing main features you will need to help differentiate your final choice.

PractiTest and Zephyr are both end-to-end Test management solutions, often considered by test teams. Zephyr is primarily a test case management add-on in Atlassian market for tools such as JIRA. PractiTest is an autonomous solution that integrates with JIRA (both Cloud and Server), as well as other external third party tools.

PractiTest Zephyr
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology: check check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
No ability to report issues directly from emails
Customization
Unique Hierarchical filters to organize information

Partial


There are no customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
Workflow check check
Reporting check check
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
check check
Ease of use check cross
Intuitive GUI & flow check cross
Service and Support check check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
check check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
check check
No embedding graphs
Activity feed cross check
  • Cloud or Installed
Cloud only
Both
  • Discussion forum
check check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
check cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
check cross

Training and methodology

Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies check check
Training for users and administrators available check check
Methodological consultation check check

Pricing

35$/45$ per tester, 15$ per developer
Not publicly available
PractiTest Zephyr
End-to-End Coverage & Methodology:
qTest check
TestLodge check
No Parameterization of Test Cases and Sets
No ability to report issues directly from emails
Customization
qTest
Unique Hierarchical filters to organize information
TestLodge

Partial


There are no customizable filters, fields, groups, reports and dashboards
Workflow
qTest check
TestLodge check
Reporting
qTest check
TestLodge check
Integrations:
[i.e Bug trackers, automation, CI & API]
qTest check
TestLodge check
Ease of use
qTest check
TestLodge cross
Intuitive GUI & flow
qTest check
TestLodge cross
Service and Support
qTest check
TestLodge check

Additional features:

  • Search with ability to add criteria
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • External dashboard and embedding graphs
qTest check
TestLodge check
No embedding graphs
Activity feed
qTest cross
TestLodge check
  • Cloud or Installed
qTest
Cloud only
TestLodge
Both
  • Discussion forum
qTest check
TestLodge check
  • Amazon advanced technology partner
qTest check
TestLodge cross
  • Session based test management (exploratory testing)
qTest check
TestLodge cross

Training and methodology

Fits Agile & Waterfall methodologies
qTest check
TestLodge check
Training for users and administrators available
qTest check
TestLodge check
Methodological consultation
qTest check
TestLodge check

Pricing

qTest
35$/45$ per tester, 15$ per developer
TestLodge
Not publicly available

 

For PractiTest free trial >>

 

*Disclaimer: Comparison research conducted by PractiTest marketing department. Any updates can be sent to: info@practitest.com